I’d love to know what the thought process is behind naming companies these days. Luckily, corporate naming conventions are not a basis of investment evaluation and don’t have a correlation with financial performance, so we’ll move on to more important criteria.

The Platform

Yext is a B2B platform that companies use to manage corporate information/facts across a multitude of online platforms such as Facebook, Google Maps, Yahoo, Bing, etc.

Let’s take a look at what a real-world example would look like. Shannon’s Shoes is a women’s shoe retailer with one location. Day-to-day operations are handled by Shannon herself and that includes online presence. She promotes the business on a multitude of platforms and has listed the company across many business directories in addition to being listed on google maps and Facebook. She’s recently moved locations and between managing the move and ensuring that operation remain as smooth as possible, she hasn’t had the time to scour the net to ensure that all social platforms/business directories reflect the new address and contact details. This is where Yext’s value add comes into play. Shannon would use the Yext platform to enter in updated contact details once and have it reflected across a number of online platforms using what Yext refers to as proprietary integrations. Also, Shannon has noticed duplicate entries of her business in a number of online directories, each with slightly different and incorrect contact details. Shannon would be able to isolate the multiple listings and have the ability to block those listings from appearing to potential customers. This sends a clear message to her potential customers online and improves her search ranking with particular search engines.

Yext appears to have anchored themselves as the go to solution in maintaining accurate corporate details online. Judging by Google search interest, Yext is the most popular, and by a large margin, among its peers.

YextVPeers_GT

Keeping in mind that the market for this sort of service is in it’s infancy, being the most searched should not be misconstrued as a recipe for positive financial performance. The real question is what kind of market penetration can they achieve? Have they reached a level of maturity or are they still in an early growth stage? We’ll try to get an understanding of this by evaluating the company’s S-1 filings as well as Google Search Trends for the company.

The Market

Yext’s S-1 filing indicates that the potential market for their business offering are the 100 million businesses listed globally on Google Maps. While this seems large, the reality of the matter is that only a segment of those businesses will really benefit from Yext’s solution. Firstly, for the many mom & pop shops that are managing maybe less than a handful of locations, they’ll often manage corporate listings in house since the cost of farming out this particular task may prove too costly and unnecessary. One source gives the opinion that an operation of 20 or more locations would be best suited for the platform.[i] On the other side of the spectrum, large corporations that have their own dedicated departments dealing with social media and web presence will often keep this task in house. Secondly, there are many directories/corporate listings that the Yext platform supports, however there are maybe a handful that really matter to businesses which means that the trade-off offered by market competitors of a much lower price point but less access to less referenced directories may be worth it. Furthermore, Yext’s platform is relatively new which means there needs to be a significant investment in generating market awareness and an understanding of the benefit of a service of this nature. Suffice to say, the estimated 100 million businesses that Yext believes to be their potential market, is likely much smaller.

Financial Performance

Yext provides revenue retention rates which in a nutshell is the calculation of how much more a client onboarded in year 1 has spent in year 2. Yext places particular focus on the mid-sized and reseller customers as their small business customers are prone to ‘high turnover’ rates. At first look, the results appear to be positive,

“Our dollar-based net retention rate was 113%, 121%, and 118% for fiscal years 2015 and 2016 and the nine months ended October 31, 2016, respectively.”

Taking a closer look, we observe a concerning trend with revenue from net new mid sized and reseller clients slowing in a significant way. The red boxes highlighted below represent revenue from net new clients onboarded for the particular year in question. As depicted, both 2015 and 2016 net new revenues lag 2014 despite significant increases in marketing and sales expenditure. This would suggest that the company may be facing platform adoption constraints.[ii] Our concern is that continued increases in marketing and sales efforts may see the company fall further into the red.

Yext_RevCohorts

From a top and bottom line perspective, we note a mixed message when comparing 2015 and 2016 results. Revenues are increasing, however not at the rate that expenses are growing which resulted in FY 2016 loss that increased on both a nominal and per share basis when compared against FY 2015.

FY Financials

The Search Trend

While financial losses are to be expected with a new company with a novel product offering, what is out of the norm is the widening financial losses coupled with what we observe to be stagnant market awareness.

Market awareness is a difficult thing to gauge; however, Google Trends can give a sense of internet search interest. We’ve taken a look at search trends for the term ‘Yext’ for the period March 2014 to January 2017[iii], we isolated searches to the United States (Company’s headquarters are in New York) and found that the trend has been relatively flat.

Yext_GT

As a company grows and awareness increases, we should see search interest grow in tandem. A red flag should be raised when search interest is stagnant or waning in the face of increased marketing and sales dollars spend. Either the marketing campaigns are ineffective or the product/service is not conducive to online search. We believe the issue to be the former since Yext’s platform is highly conducive to internet search. (Likely a person is most likely to come across this service while surfing the web.)

Concluding Remarks

We believe that the company faces an uphill battle. It is operating in a relatively new space which will require a significant investment in market awareness that may or may not lead to increased adoption rates but will certainly push the company deeper and deeper into the red. Investors should be aware that the potential market may be a lot smaller than anticipated and that market maturity may be reached at a much smaller scale. Suffice to say, investors should be cautious if considering Yext as an addition to their portfolio.

Happy Trading!

TrendVesting

[i] Youtube: “Why You Should Avoid Yext as a Small Business | Edge of the Web”
[ii] SEC S-1 financials were limited to 2015 and 2016 data. Data shows that 2016 marketing and sales expenditure increased 58% compared to 2015.
[iii] We specifically chose to exclude search trends for the period after January 2017 as the increase in search growth was likely related to Yext’s IPO filings.

 

Disclosure
Note that this research may contain information provided by the issuer that is freely available through public sources and may also contain assumptions and opinions of the author. It is highly recommended that readers cross reference and verify any information set out in this article. Any reference to third party reports and/or studies will be set out directly in the article or a supporting link will be provided. The purpose of this article is to provide supporting evidence for the continuation or reversal of existing stock price trend and does not outline specific security pricing nor financial estimates. TrendVesting, nor the author of this article does not currently nor in the preceding twelve months, as determined by the published date of this article, maintain any relationship, either first or third party, with the issuer that is the subject of this article. TrendVesting, nor the author of this article does not currently nor in the preceding twelve months, as determined by the published date of this article, maintain 1% beneficial ownership or greater of the issuer that is the subject of this article. TrendVesting, nor the author of this article does not currently hold any shares long or short or indirectly through a derivative security, of the issuer that is the subject of this article.  TrendVesting, nor the author of this article have not provided remunerable services of any sort to the issuer that is the subject of this article over the preceding twelve months as determined by the published date of this article. Trendvesting does not participate in any market making activities for any issuer, including the issuer that is the subject of this article.
Advertisements